Legislature(1993 - 1994)
1993-04-02 Senate Journal
Full Journal pdf1993-04-02 Senate Journal Page 1075 SB 100 Senator Duncan moved that the following Second Senate Finance Committee Letter of Intent be adopted: Second Finance Committee Letter of Intent for CSSB 100(FIN) am It is the intent of the Legislature that the appropriation for $391,000 set out in Sec. 38 of CSSB 100(FIN) be utilized solely for the retention of those employees, primarily in the Division of Lands, who received layoff notices on or about March 26, 1993. Senate Finance heard testimony that the department needed $391,000 for personal services to retain 31 employees working on the State Land Selection Project through the remainder of this fiscal year. 1993-04-02 Senate Journal Page 1076 SB 100 The question being: "Shall the Second Senate Finance Committee Letter of Intent be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) AM Third Reading - Final Passage Effective Date Adopt 2d Finance Letter of Intent? YEAS: 8 NAYS: 12 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Salo, Sharp, Taylor and so, the Second Senate Finance Committee Letter of Intent failed to be adopted. Senator Duncan moved that CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the purpose of rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 12 (page 1042). Senator Taylor objected. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am be returned to second reading for the purpose of rescinding action in failing to adopt Amendment No. 12?" The roll was taken with the following result: 1993-04-02 Senate Journal Page 1077 SB 100 CSSB 100(FIN) AM Return to second reading? YEAS: 10 NAYS: 10 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Phillips, Salo, Zharoff Nays: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am failed to be returned to second reading. Senator Lincoln rose to a point of order. President Halford stated the first roll call would be voided and a second roll call vote would be taken. The question being: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am "An Act making supplemental and special appropriations for the expenses of state government; making, amending, and repealing capital and operating appropriations; and providing for an effective date" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) AM Third Reading - Final Passage YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 100(FIN) am passed the Senate with a Senate Letter of Intent. 1993-04-02 Senate Journal Page 1078 SB 100 Senator Taylor moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSSB 100(FIN) AM Effective Date YEAS: 11 NAYS: 9 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Frank, Halford, Jacko, Kelly, Leman, Miller, Pearce, Phillips, Rieger, Sharp, Taylor Nays: Adams, Donley, Duncan, Ellis, Kerttula, Lincoln, Little, Salo, Zharoff and so, the effective date clause failed. Senator Duncan gave notice of reconsideration.